Quote:
Originally Posted by ejectjoy
.......
I agree with Joker that those who do not offer DFK will have less customers.
..... Truly endorsed such unselfish sharing! (Not quite agreeing with MP on the possible adverse impact on some WLs. I think they have to learn to handle it ...)
)
|
Well, am afraid that either you have mis-interpreted my comment or your perspective on what I commented was too superficial ... I wasn’t implying services like DFK which to me is considered mild. I was inferring to a bigger picture where I advocate that FR writers need to be more discreet and rational especially if ones FR/post tends to be ultra explicit. Let me cite u one good example; over at 1820 thread, Lioncityboy was discussing and specifically said which WL in 1820 allow raw sex ... whether what they uttered is true or not, they should not openly utter this subject ... Do you still agree now that this kinda comment/post has a significant adverse impact on the WL? FYI, AV strictly does not permit raw sex and in fact, they also expect WL to adopt CBJ ... It is just that it is rather hard for AV to enforce this ruling. Are you aware that AV deported one Malaysian WL many years ago when she was found to offer raw to many of her clients? She was the unlucky one as she was being sabotaged. In fact many WL during that era were prolific raw-ers!
There are certain things we FR writers need to censor and yet try to be truthful and accurate in what we penned. However regret to say not all are sensible and rational. In my years of experience as a player of GL, I know very well the WL wouldn’t like me to share to others (even without her telling me) if she offered certain services to me as well as some of her clients that she doesn’t offer to the majority ... of course sometime some WL may make a direct request ...