Quote:
Originally Posted by sammyboyfor
It used to be like that but it ended up as open warfare which spilled over into the real world. There were threats of physical violence.
The problem when nicks are revealed is even worse and there is no way those with low power dare to take on the old timers.
This way is fairer. The weaker ones can show their displeasure without having to worry about revenge attacks from a rabid gang.
|
But the way things are - with these clones and it seems to me some kind of concerted attacks by whoever feels slighted - how does "weaker ones" like I who only as his single handle here able to show my displeasure" at anybody and for it to mean ANYTHING? I can only zap him once and he can just as easily awards himself multiple points to negate - and bury from others - such expressions of displeasure. In fact, with that dan101 which I saw being docked to -269 - within one day he was back up to +269!! In effect just showing his middle finger to you and telling you that he reigns supreme/untouchable on here.
So you're OK with Samsters here - who really don't even pay you anything - to just run rampant and dictate their own wishes and rules OVER you?? Heck, I can appreciate allowing clones IF you were to charge each additional handle from each ISP address some kind of "clone fee" or whatever - but as it is - why allow these guys to ride roughshod over you...and you not benefiting in any way (and actually loosing out IMHO)?
SEAJ